Thursday, July 7, 2011

On human health, interesting the public, and good scientific journalism...

from http://evidencebasedliving.human.cornell.edu/
In addition to the "pulled from the scientific journal headlines" research discussed here, I thought it would be interesting to periodically showcase fascinating research that I read elsewhere.  Awesome and interesting research about human health, disease and immunology is everywhere and sometimes, it's written about in a way that is clear, accurate and easy to understand!  That last point is exactly what Escaping Anergy is all about: a place to see, interpret, discuss and most importantly-UNDERSTAND- the scientific data behind the science stories we read about, the diseases we encounter and the medicines we take!

Today I came across a story published in The New York Times written by Laura Beil entitled: "In eyes, a clock calibrated by wavelengths of light".   It seemed apropos for me to include this NYT article after just posting about new data indicating a role for sleep in boosting vaccine efficiency!  Beil briefly, but accurately discusses the research from the University of Basel regarding how blue light (the kind strongly emitted by LED TVs, laptops, etc) enhances our alertness while inhibiting our ability to become sleepy.  In short, this happens because blue light (compared to reddish/orange light like older incandescent light bulbs) slows the production of melatonin, a light-sensitive hormone that induces sleep and is critical for the maintenance of circadian rhythm (why we humans sleep at night and are awake when it's light).  Biel also discusses how this new data may play a role understanding cancer progression and infection susceptibility as people are increasingly tied to electronic devices that utilize blue light.  

The lead author on this paper, Christian Cajochen, is the head for the Center for Chronobiology at the University of Basel and a quick pubmed search reveals that he also recently published in Proceedings of the National Sciences (PNAS) regarding the role of serum proteins in regulating the circadian rhythms of fibroblasts (cells that are important in wound healing and disease)! Although they still don't know which protein(s), the most common in serum include: antibodies, complement (important in killing invading microbes), and albumin, it is very exciting learning that our immune system is tightly connected with nearly every physiological process including sleep and circadian rhythm maintenance!

The idea that light affects the way we sleep and that sleep can in turn modulate disease is not a new revelation, however what remains to be clear is HOW exactly this all happens. The more we research, the more we will understand the underlying mechanisms that control human disease (progression, susceptibility, and host defense ability). The role of sleep and light is just now becoming of interest in the immunology and medical research fields, with many intriguing findings! It's exciting to live in a time when there's so much quality and new research available for the public to learn about and discuss!


What's a great science-related story you've read about recently?  What kind of research would you like to see more of discussed on Escaping Anergy?  I appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Thanks for reading!


ResearchBlogging.org
Cajochen C, Frey S, Anders D, Späti J, Bues M, Pross A, Mager R, Wirz-Justice A, & Stefani O (2011). Evening exposure to a light-emitting diodes (LED)-backlit computer screen affects circadian physiology and cognitive performance. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 110 (5), 1432-8 PMID: 21415172

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

How to get the most out of your next vaccine? A full night's sleep may enhance protection against viral infections

from gabby22197.glogster.com
Public Interest Note:
Let’s begin with a simple question: Why do we sleep?  To answer this, we can think of what happens when we don’t get enough or any sleep.  The day after a sleepless night, often we feel irritable, exhausted, unhappy and stressed.  If you are a parent, have a full-time job or a fellow graduate student you are acutely familiar with how precious even a few hours of sleep can be in redeeming your sense of sanity.  The side effects of sleep can become dangerous when the actions of a sleep-deprived individual affect those around him/her.  In March, an air traffic controller at Ronald Reagan Washington Airport fell asleep on the job, leaving two planes alone in the sky trying to land the planes alone.1 Fortunately, in this case, no one was terrible injured, but the news magnified the public’s awareness and outrage of having to depend on sleep-deprived individuals for our safety.  It’s not surprising the single air traffic controller fell asleep on the job since it was reported this was “his fourth consecutive overnight shift, which runs from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.” 1 In fact, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine International Classification of Sleep Disorders classifies this condition as Shift Work Sleep Disorder (SWSD).  SWSD plagues nearly 70% of the 15 million Americans who work shifts between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.2   It is further estimated that sleep deprived workers cost U.S. businesses $18 billion a year.3  
from cdc.gov
Importantly, sleepiness does not only affect the people who work the “graveyard shift”, but in an increasingly fast-paced society, coupled with a tough economy and technology-rich environment, many Americans are spending less time asleep.  The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revealed that more than 35% of the 74,571 adult Americans surveyed get less than 7 hours of sleep a day and 37.9% reported “unintentionally falling asleep during the day at least once in the preceding month.  Alarmingly, nearly 5% of respondents admitted to nodding off while driving at least once in the past month. 4   Furthermore, it is estimated that sleep deprivation causes nearly 100,000 vehicle crashes and 1,500 deaths annually in the U.S.5 Perhaps, if people more strictly followed the CDC’s recommendation of getting 7-9 hrs of sleep (for adults), such scary statistics will improve and save our economy billions of dollars.  But why does the CDC discuss anything about sleep?  Does sleep have a role in disease prevention?
We know what happens to our bodies when we are sleep deprived: red eyes, achy joints, and sometimes we even catch a cold.  Besides behavioral problems that arise when we are sleep deprived, our immune system becomes compromised as well.  For that reason, the CDC warns, “persons experiencing sleep insufficiency are also more likely to suffer from chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, depression and obesity…” The CDC refers to America’s sleep deprivation problem as an epidemic, a public health concern.  The problem of sleep deprivation in America is so great that since there is even a national organization called the National Sleep Foundation devoted to alerting the public, policy makers and healthcare providers of the consequences related to sleeping insufficiencies. Such agencies are worried that a continuously sleepy nation will result in a sick nation with increased susceptibility to infections and disease-which ultimately will cost the country billions and hamper productivity.  

Sleep Deprivation: The Immunology Behind It
EEG charts and amount of time spent in each sleep cycle, stages 3 and 4 constitue SWS which is also the time in sleep when pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1 and TNFalpha peak. Lange, et al. establishes that a full-night's sleep post vaccination BOOSTS your immunological memory, perhaps enhancing the vaccine's effectiveness. Image from seamist.hubpages.com
First, how does one define and measure sleep? There are two types of sleep: non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) and rapid eye-movement (REM).    There are 5 main stages of sleep beginning with stage 1 in which you are just lying down to sleep, but still pretty conscious.  Stage 2 follows with a lower level of consciousness that develops into stages and 3 and 4.  Stages 3 and 4 are collectively called slow wave sleep (SWS).  Under SWS, the brain is at its lowest level of consciousness and is thought to be involved in restorative functions.  Lastly, REM is the final step in sleep and is when our brains are processing information and dreaming.  When asleep, we typically spend equal parts in REM and SWS.  Sleep stages can be monitored via EEG recordings as each stage has distinctly different frequencies and EEG wave amplitudes.6
 In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, Toth and colleagues performed a series of infections on rabbits and monitored the animal’s sleep patterns during infections.  They tested a virus (influenza), bacteria (Staph. aureus and E. coli ), yeast (Candida albicans) and parasite (Trypansosoma brucei).  Each infection resulted in abhorrent sleep patterns, regardless of microorganism.  In general, the various infections increased the duration of slow wave sleep (SWS). 6,7  The observation that infection increases SWS, but not other sleep stages, may mean that SWS, in particular, regulates our immune response while we are sleeping.  In humans, one of the most well studied infections to examine in regards to sleep is T. brucei, the parasite that causes Human African trypanosomiasis aka African sleeping sickness.  Infected individuals, usually by the second year of infection, lose the ability to manage their circadian rhythm resulting in the complete loss of sleep regulation and often leads to comatose.  In mice and rabbits, the release of parasites into the bloodstream is associated with acute increases in SWS, however this has not been evaluated in humans. 6
So what immune factors are modulated by sleep?  First, it is known that the majority of our immune cells, B and T cells and monocytes reach maximal levels in the blood during the night and are lowest when awake.8 In addition, the pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNFalpha and IL-1beta plasma levels also peak while we sleep, being the highest at the onset of SWS.8 An increase of either of these cytokines subsequently increases SWS duration, whereas decreases in TNFalpha or IL-1beta blocks SWS.6 This appears to be the clearest example of how our sleep patterns may regulate our immune response during infection. Both of these cytokines are critical in the clearance of infection and are some of the most abundant cytokines present during infectious diseases.  Therefore it seems to make sense why an increase in SWS during the diseases mentioned above occurs. 
Interestingly, infection is not the only thing that induces TNFa and IL-1beta release in the brain and plasma.  Sleep deprivation also promotes pro-inflammatory cytokine release, which then instructs your brain to increase the time it spends in SWS.  Alternatively, anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 is thought to inhibit SWS onset by antagonizing IL-1beta and TNFalpha.  It is also thought the induction of certain hormones such growth hormone (GH) and prolactin promote the release of IL-1beta, since inhibiting these hormones attenuates IL-1beta levels and SWS duration.  Conversely, the anti-inflammatory hormone, cortisol does the opposite, and decreases IL-1beta production.6 So it appears that our immune system mirrors our endocrine system in that they both regulate our sleep patterns by releasing pro- and anti- sleep mediators.  
TNFalpha and IL-1beta are generally thought of activators of the innate immune response, such as macrophages and dendritic cells.  Such cytokines act as an adjuvent, boosting the macrophage and dendritic cell's ability to be potent antigen presenting cells (APC).  The main job of an APC, is to display bits of processed pathogen (antigen) to a T cell.  Once a T cell recognizes a particular antigen, it then becomes activated and ready to fight the infection and help B cells secrete antibodies.  Realize that the next time you become ill and start to feel sleepy, your immune system is starting to work and that you should rest so that your body can adequately defend itself against infection.  Ignoring our body's demand for sleep affects the way our bodies fight diseases.  In a few human studies, it was revealed that the number of T helper cells decreased and the level circulating antibodies decreased with sleep deprivation.6 Not surprisingly, when the body is pushed to the extreme of total sleep deprivation, the immune system fails completely.  In one study, rats were sleep deprived for 21 days, until near death.  At the end of the 21 days, the rats had suffered from severe weight loss and septicemia with both opportunistic and pathogenic microbes in the blood.9 Furthermore, a recent survey of more than a million participants demonstrated a strong correlation between sleep of less than 7 hours a night and increased mortality.10
  
Sleep Deprivation and Disease: Why This Research Paper Matters
The evidence is clear: our immune system communicates with our brain while we sleep, but researchers have only begun scratching at the mechanisms behind this phenomenon.  This is very exciting and novel research that may provide not only insight into how the body operates, but also instigate new therapeutic approaches in fighting disease.  Although it is well established the role of certain cytokines in maintaining healthy sleep cycles and how the immune system responds to sleep deprivation, little is known about the effect sleep has on specific immune cell function.  The majority of what we know about the interplay between sleep and immune function is correlative.  For example, we know TNFalpha can promote APC function, and we know that TNFalpha levels increase during SWS, but it remains elusive whether sleep-induced TNFalpha promote APC function and thereby program and effective T cell response.  Sleep may represent a crucial part of the immune system that has been largely ignored by the immunological and medical fields.  Perhaps, the notion “Sick and Tired” can be immunologically explained and that greater insight into how sleep affects the body’s ability to clear infection is an underlying mechanism behind the increase of infections among infants and the elderly (acute vs chronic sleep deprivation).  How does sleep impact our ability to properly activate our immune system?  Can sleep play a role in designing better therapies and treatments for people fighting disease?   These questions motivate Jan Born’s research group at the University of Lubeck in Germany to find new ways to make more efficient vaccines…without even changing the vaccine components!  Therefore, as Lange, T. et al illustrates in their recent Journal of Immunology paper, catching a full night of ZZZ's  can make all the difference in getting the most out of your next vaccination.

What the &*%$#! Does the Title Mean?!

There are two waves of antibody response: a slower, short-lived response during the initial infection followed by a quicker, longer-lived memory response . from click4biology.info
1) The essential point of vaccination is providing people with the antibodies needed to clear infections quickly and effectively.  Vaccines work by administering something that stimulates the adaptive immune response without causing disease.  Vaccines in the U.S. consist of purified proteins (not a whole, intact pathogen) from a pathogen that is injected or inhaled.  When APCs encounter the proteins in the vaccine, they cut the proteins into short peptide sequences.  Once processed, an APC presents the peptide on its surface to a T helper cell, which are named so because they help B cells make antibodies and help innate immune cells to destroy pathogens.  At the moment when the T helper cell recognizes a certain peptide sequence, the T cell begins to proliferate and secrete cytokines that help B cells secrete tons of antibodies- all of which can specifically target the protein that was used in the vaccine.  Vaccines help prevent infectious diseases by assisting our immune system in making the antibodies necessary to clearing an infection quickly.  When we become infected with something that we didn’t vaccinate against, our immune system has to take a lot of time (weeks) to produce the antibodies needed to fight the infection.  Some pathogens are extremely virulent and can cause a lot of harm, even death in the weeks it takes our bodies to properly protect itself against it.  Vaccines therefore help equip our immune system with the weapons (antibodies) it needs, before even heading into battle against a deadly pathogen. 
 2) Of course, this concept of a vaccine works best when the immune system can remember what the pathogen looks like when it encounters it a month, a year, or 10 years from the time of vaccination.  This is immunological memory.  An amazing aspect of your immune system is that when the adaptive immune cells, B and T cells, are activated and proliferate, some of the cells seem to last forever.  These cells are aptly named, memory B and T cells.  These memory cells will last you during your entire life time, always remembering what they are supposed to do when they encounter the specific protein or peptide that stimulated them to become active in the first place.  In order to maximize immunogenicity and achieve immunological memory you need a very good induction of the antigen-presenting cells by using adjuvants and booster shots to bolster the ability of your body to produce a reservoir of effective memory cells ready to kill a particular pathogen over the course of your life!

Compile this information together and we can infer that: Sleep following a vaccination, acts like an adjuvent promoting the development of memory cells that provides long-term immunological protection against a certain pathogen.  

Ready for an adventure? Read on for a guided-tour through the scientific data!

But first: A brief Q and A session regarding the overall experimental approach:

Q) What organism(s) was being tested?
A) All of the experiments presented here were performed on human volunteers.  The sample size consisted of 27 healthy, nonsmoking men with an average age of 26.  The group was on synchronized schedules with the same sleep-wake patterns for the 6 weeks prior to experimental testing.  All sleep-wake activity occurred in a sleep laboratory, and all participants had spent at least one night in the lab prior to experimental testing.  The group was randomly assigned to either the “sleep” or “wakefulness” group. 

Q) How did the “sleep” group differ from the “wakefulness” group?
A) The sleep patterns between the groups only differ the night following their vaccination (which occurred at 8am and occurred 3 times, one in Feb., March, and June. The “sleep” group had lights off at 11pm and lights on at 6:30am in the sleep laboratory.  During this same time, the “wakefulness” group stayed awake in bed watching TV, reading, listening to music or talking to a scientist (fun, no?)  The “wake” group was not allowed to sleep until 8pm the following day.  This may seem a bit extreme and rare that people would be awake for this long following a vaccine shot, but it does adequately distinguish the two experimental groups clearly. 

Q) What vaccine was used?
A) Hepatitis A vaccine (Twinrix, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals)

Q) What did the researchers monitor throughout the trial period?
A) Four major conditions were tested:
1. Sleep activity via electroencephalography (EEG) to examine sleep stages.
2. Hormone analysis to investigate sleep-related hormone release via i.v. blood collection.
3. Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) - specific T helper cell response
4. HAV - specific antibody response
For immune response, peripheral blood cells (to look at T cells) and serum (where antibodies are found) was collected by drawing blood immediately before vaccination and then 1,2, and 4 weeks after each shot as well as a follow-up at 1 yr. after the first inoculation.

Now let’s dive into the results!
Because the whole basis of this paper rests on sleep activity it is first imperative that the authors of the paper show that the people in the “sleep” group slept normally.  Normal meaning that they spent time in each of the known sleep stages (see the above figure) that fit data that is already well established in the field, with nearly 50% of sleep spent in slow wave sleep (SWS; stages 3+4) and 50% in REM sleep.  There was no significant differences between the three sleep nights post vaccination. 
Over the course of the Hepatitis A vaccination period, blood was obtained to examine the T cell response. This is very important to look at because it is a standard read-out for the quality of a vaccine.  Recall that most vaccines, including the Hepatitis A vaccine, consist of purified proteins that contain immunogenic Hepatitis A viral proteins.  Once these proteins are injected, they enter the blood and tissue where they will be taken up by macrophages and dendritic cells.  Which is very convenient since these cells are antigen-presenting cells (APCs).  So then these APCs digest the viral proteins into smaller peptides and present these peptides on their surface so T cells can “see” the peptide.  If a T cell recognizes that particular peptide, the T cells become divides rapidly producing hundreds of more T cells that all are specific for that peptide.  Scientists can find out how well a vaccine is working by determining how many vaccine-specific T cells there are-the more there are, the more protection will be provided, the better the vaccine.   When a T helper cell encounters a peptide it’s specific for, it not only divides like crazy but it also upregulates an activation marker on its surface called CD40L.   For the purpose of this paper, it’s just important to understand that some proteins like CD40L can be used as a diagnostic tool to track the progression of T cell activation following vaccination.   In this experiment, Lange and colleagues, drew blood from the HAV-vaccinated men in both the “sleep” and “wakefulness” groups, then stimulated the blood cells with a pool of HAV peptides for 6 hours.  In this short amount of time, the only cells expressing CD40L are T helper cells that responded to and are therefore specific for HAV.  In both groups, the % of CD40L+ HAV-specific T helper cells increases.    It is important to note, that quickly following a shot, there is increase followed by a plateau of activated HAV-specific T helper cells and that with each vaccine shot, the T cell response to the vaccine increases; this is the purpose of booster shots.  The surprising result was that by the second HAV shot, there was a significantly lower T helper response in the “wakefulness” group than the “sleep” group.   Intriguingly, this difference lasted even 1 year after the initial vaccine shot with the “sleep” group having 2 times the number of activated, HAV-specific T helper cells than the “wakefulness” group.  Remember that the only major variable between the groups is that the “sleep” group went to sleep the night following the vaccination shots and the “wakefulness” group did not.  This one difference in sleep scheduling contributed to a two-fold difference in T cell activation and response to the HAV vaccine!
 Remember that T helper cells are called “helpers” because they produce cytokines that help other immune cells to become activated and better responsive to the vaccine leading to better protection against pathogens.  To make sure that the HAV-specific T helper cells they were detecting were in fact “helpers”, Lange, et al. measured various cytokines produced from CD40L+ cells in response to the HAV peptide pool.  In all the cytokines tested, the “sleep” group produced significantly more cytokines (Interferon(IFN)gamma, Interleukin(IL)-2, Tumor necrosis factor(TNF)alpha, and IL-4) than the group didn’t go to sleep after getting their vaccine shot.  
 In addition, T helper cells are “helpers” because they “help” B cells to produce and release antibodies (IL-4 helps this, for example).  Because antibodies are one of the major ways vaccines work to protect you against pathogens, the authors of this paper needed to assess whether antibody production is also affected by sleep.  To do this, they need to isolate the serum from the blood cells when they collect the blood samples.  Once they have the serum, which contains proteins and antibodies but not cells, they can look for HAV-specific antibodies-which is basically like searching for a needle in a haystack.  However, researchers can find HAV-specific antibodies in serum by performing an Enzyme-LinkedImmunosorbent Assay (ELISA).  The basis for an ELISA is using a culture plate coated with HAV proteins and then adding serum to the coated plate.  After a brief incubation period, the plate is washed thoroughly, and because antibodies bind extremely well to specific proteins, only the HAV-specific antibodies will stick to the plate, whereas the non-HAV antibodies floating in the serum will be washed away.  Finally, the amount of HAV-specific antibodies present (antibody titer) can be determined easily.  By this method, which is a very common, standard method used by immunologists and medical professionals, they found the people who slept the night following a vaccine shot produced significantly more HAV-specific IgG antibodies compared to those who didn’t get any sleep!
 What is very interesting is that the percentage of HAV-specific T helper cells greatly correlated with the sleep stage #4 compared to the other sleep stages, suggesting that something was present during sleep stage #4 might be regulating this phenomena.  Lange, et al. had found that hormones such as growth hormone (GH) and prolactin levels increased profoundly during SWS period.  Recall, that these hormones induce an inflammatory response, which has been studied extensively as a way the body regulates itself to become sleepy.  What is less known, is if these sleep-associated hormones have a role during the immune response as well.  What these data indicate is that GH and prolactin not only regulates the brain to induce sleep, but they also regulate the immune system to induce a highly activated immune response upon vaccination!  
Furthermore, during SWS, cortisol levels –which is immunosuppressive- is very low.  Given these data, the authors hypothesized that increase in GH and prolactin coupled with the decrease in cortisol levels during SWS provided a boost to the HAV vaccine that the “wakefulness” group did not receive.  In this way, these sleep-associated hormones behave like an adjuvant that further stimulates APCs to activate T helper cells.  By determining an “adjuvant factor” (GH x prolactin divided by cortisol levels), and correlating this “adjuvant factor” with the percent of HAV-specific T helper cells, Lange, et al. discovered the production of GH, prolactin and cortisol can eloquently predict the development of a strong HAV-specific immune response!
  As the authors admit, “the immunoregulatory functions of sleep are not well understood”.  Which makes this particular research so exciting and novel!  Of course, there are lots to expand upon and investigate to better understand how exactly these sleep-associated hormones boost the immune response to the HAV vaccine.  It would also be very interesting to know if sleep affects other vaccines besides HAV and if sleep cycles in women or people who are older or younger than the group tested in this paper provide similar results.  From an immunologist’s perspective, I think it would be valuable to know not only if the development of immune response to the HAV vaccine is significantly better, but also if the immune response is functionally improved because of sleep.  Which will be difficult to do in humans (people are ok with volunteering for a HAV vaccine, but to also volunteer to get infected with HAV? Probably not so great.) But perhaps this aspect could be assessed in mice or by looking at sleep patterns among people who have Hepatitis A and seeing if there is a smaller viral titer in people who sleep more.  It might seem ridiculous, that this paper rests all of its results on the one difference of either sleeping 7.5 hours or not sleeping at all, because it might appear that this data is only applicable if you are an insomniac.  It would be interesting to know what exactly the threshold of sleep (hours) is required to see the phenomena they illustrate in this paper.  However, what this research provides is strong evidence that little to no sleep has a profound effect on the development of your immune response during vaccination.  Interestingly, it would be important to test if sleep-associated hormones have a similar effect during infection with a live virus since this data might provide new insight into why newborns are highly susceptible to such infections (what newborn do you know that sleeps 7+ hours a night?) and why people who work 16+ hour days or graveyard shifts spend more time sick than people who work 9-5.  
Since starting graduate school, I’ve noticed that I have spent more days a year sick than I ever have, I used to think it was because of my increase use of public transportation, living in a bigger city, and interacting with more people (big lab, friends, students of mine, seminars, etc) than I had in my past.  But now, I think that I had been neglecting one of the major differences between life before graduate school and now: longer hours working in the lab generally means less sleep at home.  As if I needed another motivational reason to be done with graduate school!

ResearchBlogging.org Lange T, Dimitrov S, Bollinger T, Diekelmann S, & Born J (2011). Sleep after vaccination boosts immunological memory. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 187 (1), 283-90 PMID: 21632713








References and Further Reading: 
1.    Hosford, M. et al. “Air traffic controller asleep on duty at Reagan National, NTSB says”. ABC News. (2011). 
2.    Beers, TM. “Flexible schedules and shift work: replacing the “9-to-5” workday?”. Monthly Labor Review. (2000). 
3.    Awake in Philly Community Education Group. “Fact sheet: shift work sleep disorder”. (2004). 
4.    CDC. “Insufficient sleep is a public health epidemic”. (2011). 
5.    US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center on Sleep Disorders Research, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. “Drowsy driving and automobile crashes” (2011). 
6.    Bryant, PA., et al. “Sick and tired: does sleep have a vital role in the immune system?” Nature Reviews Immunology. 4:457-467. (2004). 
7.    Toth, LA., et al. “Alteration of sleep in rabbits by Staphylococcus aureus infection”. Infect. Immunity. 58: 1785-1791. (1988). 
8.    Born, J., et al. Effects of sleep and circadian rhythm on human circulating immune cells”. Journal of Immunology. 158:4454-4464. (1997). 
9.    Everson, CA. “Sustained sleep deprivation impairs host defense”. Am. J. Physiol. 265:R1148-R1154. (1993). 
10. Kripke, DF., et al. Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia”. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry.” 59:131-136. (2002).

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Think twice before diving into a high-fat diet: New research indicates how saturated fatty acids promote the development of Type 2 Diabetes


from ryangruss.com
Public Interest Note:
We hardly need to read or watch the news everyday to observe one of the fastest growing trends in America: obesity. Obesity is defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention “as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or greater.  BMI is calculated from a person’s weight and height and provides a reasonable indicator of body fatness” According the CDC, nearly every state in the U.S. has populations containing at least 20% obese adults1.  Of course, obesity does not merely affect Americans, as the World Health Organization estimates more than 300 million people around the world are obese2.
Our friends and family and self-help books tell us that  “beauty comes in all shapes and sizes” and we want to believe this.  Hearing this makes us feel beautiful no matter what we look like, and we’re lucky to be surrounded by people that will love us unconditionally.  But at the same time it’s important to realize that it may not be so beautiful to be dependent on insulin injections to survive, suffering from chronic inflammation and increased susceptibility to infections.  The link between obesity and a variety of health concerns including heart disease and diabetes is well established.  A 2010 study spearheaded by Kaiser Permanente and published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) showed that heart disease has dropped significantly-by 24%- between 1999-2008.  Much of this decline, the research team noted, is attributable to decreases in cigarette smoking and increases in the use of cardio-protective medications during the course of those years3. Importantly, in the same issue of NEJM a perspective editorial by Drs. Jerimiah Brown and Gerald O’Conner, noted that during those same years 1999-2008, the incidence rate for Type 2 Diabetes and obesity increased.  They concluded “These trends suggest that we are succeeding some areas by reducing the burden of modifiable risk factors, such as smoking, hypertension, and high cholesterol levels, but that our society’s diabetes and obesity problems are worsening.”4 The data supporting a link between obesity and diabetes is clear, both of which cause detriment not only to us individuals, but also to our community with increased medical costs, unhealthy workforces and reduced life expectancies.
The role of scientists and doctors is vital and necessary in fighting this disappointing epidemic.  In the early 1950’s Dr. Hans Kraus had published a series of provoking research articles regarding the lack of physical activity of Americans, specifically the children.  In comparison to European children in a series of physical activity tests, Kraus and colleagues revealed out of 4,400 students (age 6-16) “56 percent of the U.S. students failed at least one of the test components…only about 8% of the European children failed”5.  These startling data quickly stirred interest among the general public, as people began to consider more the importance of diet and exercise to lead healthy, productive lives.  Not only the lives of individuals, but the life of the country as a whole and in 1955 President Eisenhower invited Dr. Kraus for a meeting to establish a course of action based on the data presented.  In less than year, the President commissioned the  “President’s Council on Youth Fitness” to organize a new initiative called the “Presidential Fitness Awards” in which for school children complete a series of physical fitness tests to receive one of these awards.  The program functions still today as a way to fight obesity and helped bolster the “Let’sMove” campaign commissioned by First Lady Michelle Obama as a way to “change the way a generation of kids thinks about food and nutrition” and reduce childhood obesity to 5% by 2030 6.  The achievement lead by Kraus over 50 years ago highlights the value of cross talk between scientists and the public and set into motion America’s growing interest in fitness and healthy lifestyles. 

Type 2 Diabetes: The Immunology Behind the Disease
Eating whole foods, balanced meals and small portions play a role in maintaining our figures curvy and toned, while simultaneously regulating body’s ability to function properly.  Our bodies need to consume foods for nutritional benefit, but what happens when we eat too much, especially foods high in salt, sugar and fat?  The most witnessed observation is the accumulation of weight, in the form of fat, deposits in our bellies contributing to our subcutaneous (just beneath the skin) or visceral (covering our organs) fat tissue.  When we think of fat, most of us think of glossy white lining of our T-bone steaks.  Although it looks like it serves no better function that to moisten our steaks, our fat tissue is a quite dynamic place to be, especially for an adipocyte.  Adipocytes are the cells that largely make up our fat tissue (anatomically referred to as adipose tissue).  These cells are unique compared to all the other cells in our bodies.  Adipocytes store fats derived from food and liver metabolism.  The storage of fats by these cells are vitally important such that adipose tissue protects our organs and acts as a buffer to help ward off certain pathogens.  Moreover, because the metabolism of fat releases more energy than proteins or carbohydrates, adipose tissue represents the largest energy storage in our bodies.  When we eat too much and exercise too little, our adipose tissue increases, literally.  As our adipocytes store more and more fat they swell to accommodate the new intake.  This of course can be very bad for the rest of our body-most obviously for the organs that lie beneath this mounting fat-which often times is why obesity is linked to a variety of progressive diseases, simply because our diagnostic tools cannot access the affected organ and therefore inhibit many useful prevention strategies to combat such diseases.  
             So what does any of this have to with your immune system?  As I hope you will begin to appreciate, your immune system is an amazing, peculiar system that seems to be involved in nearly every function in your body.  Least of which includes your fat-or at least how it’s maintained.  It’s incredible that our bodies have evolved to become vastly dependent upon one, single protein, insulin, with which we wouldn’t be able to focus, our blood pressure would raise uncontrollably-it short, and our body would crash.  Insulin is a natural hormone produced by beta islet cells in the pancreas in response to increased blood glucose levels.  The insulin secreted by the pancreas signals through insulin receptors, which are expressed by the cells that regulate our blood glucose levels, largely our liver cells and adipocytes.  Once insulin has bound to its receptor it activates the adipocytes to absorb any glucose that comes its way, thereby lowering the blood glucose levels and returning the body to homeostasis.  When the body is unable to produce insulin or becomes unable to respond to insulin-diabetes develops.
            Let’s be clear about one thing: your immune system is tightly involved in the development of Diabetes-both Type 1 and Type 2, but in completely different ways.  Type 1 Diabetes (also known as juvenile diabetes and diabetes mellitus) is an autoimmune disorder.  Recall from the last post that autoimmunity is the result of self-reactive T cells circulating through the body, recognize self-antigen as foreign and trigger the death of any cell expressing that particular antigen.  In the case of Type 1 Diabetes, the self-antigen that’s being attacked is insulin-so therefore beta islet cells are under attack by the body’s own immune system.  It is for this reason that people diagnosed with this type of diabetes must take insulin shots to balance their blood-glucose levels since they cannot produce insulin independently.  Conversely, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a metabolic disorder tightly associated with obesity and results in insulin insensitivity that is, although the body can make insulin just fine, the adipocytes can’t respond to it and therefore can’t remove lower glucose levels from the blood.  Essentially, the body is consuming more sugar and fat than it can regulate, and for reasons incompletely understood, the body loses the ability to recognize all the insulin being produced because of this resulting in hyperglycemia. The role of the immune system is quite evident in the case of Type 1 Diabetes, but it less obvious in the pathology of T2D. 
            In the 1990’s it was demonstrated that obese tissue released more inflammatory cytokines than lean tissue, thus beginning the investigation of the role inflammation in T2D development 7.  Cytokines are small molecules secreted by immune cells that activate the immune system, some cytokines promote inflammation.  Two of the most studied inflammatory cytokines are TNFalpha and IL-1beta, which are usually released during infections.  These cytokines are secreted by immune cells once the cell receives instructions to do so.  Immune cells are able to recognize invading pathogens quickly by recognizing certain pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are only present on microbes and not our own cells.  PAMPs stimulate Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) to induce TNFalpha and IL-1beta release, respectfully.  These cytokines are inflammatory because they recruit more immune cells to the site of infection and starts the process of inflammation characterized by swelling, fever, redness, and pain-all of which is required to fight infection.  This clever detection system allows for the quick response by innate immune cells (macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils) to activate the rest of the immune system to destroy the invading bug.  Our innate immune cells are the first the cells to respond to an immunological threat.   
Within the past couple decades it was discovered that fat tissue does not merely contain adipocytes, but is full of immune cells too, especially one particular immune cell-the macrophage.  The macrophage is named so because it is one of the largest immune cells and engulfs nearly everything it crosses.  You can think of it as the janitorial cell of the body, clearing tissue from cell debris and microbes.  Earlier just this year, Vishwa Deep Dixit’s laboratory based at Louisiana State University, established a role for fat-associated macrophages in controlling obesity-induced T2D.  They had established a model to study T2D by engineering mice that were deficient for a particular NLR (NLRP3), which is important for IL-1beta release.  When these mice were fed a high-fat diet, their blood-glucose levels were lower than their wild-type counterparts.  Furthermore, the fat-associated macrophages possessed anti-inflammatory characteristics whereas wild-type mice fed a high-fat diet contained highly inflammatory macrophages within their fat tissue.  Moreover, they showed that IL-1beta released by macrophages induce other immune cells to develop insulin resistance and perpetuate the inflammatory response, which ultimately leads to chronic inflammation and T2D 8.  Although, these authors convincingly demonstrated the role of NLRP3-induced IL-1beta in the development of T2D and chronic inflammation, what was directly activating the fat-associated macrophage to produce IL-1beta in the first place remained elusive. 
As you’ll recall, macrophages become activated via TLR or NLR stimulation.  Macrophages usually require a TLR or NLR activator in order to produce inflammatory cytokines like IL-1beta.  So, in the absence of microbial infection (which is the standard activator of these receptors) how do these inflammatory cytokines get released in the fat tissue? What is present in the adipose tissue that activates macrophages to release IL-1beta, a cytokine critically important in the progression of T2D? That is the great mystery and focus of the research discussed below that was recently published by Dr. Jenny Ting's research group at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Treating Diabetes and Obesity: Why This Research Paper Matters:
            The best prevention is clear: exercise daily and eat balanced, small-portioned meals.  However, in some cases, people are more genetically susceptible in developing the disease or for some individuals, diet and exercise isn’t enough to control the disease.  For these people, there is little treatment options available.  Currently, anti-inflammatory diets are popping up on the scene as alternative diet plans to help combat diseases associated with chronic inflammation.  Such diets are heavy in foods that people should be eating more of regardless of their health conditions: whole vegetables and fruits rich in vitamins and anti-oxidants, which help combat inflammation.  Although the value of eating such foods is becoming increasingly acknowledged, the mechanisms by which these foods block inflammation is less known.  For example, although for decades, millions of people take omega-3 fatty acid (fish oil) supplements for its anti-inflammatory properties, it was not until 2010 that a team of researchers identified the exactly how omgea-3 fatty acids were able to dampen inflammation! Not only did these researchers discover the receptor that binds omega-3 fatty acids and that this receptor inhibits TLR-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine release from macrophages, but they also provide incredible data showing that omega-3 fatty acids that bind this receptor promotes insulin sensitivity!9 This new data suggests the use of omega-3 fatty acid as a possible treatment option specifically for T2D.   As it turns out, many drugs and supplements are prescribed without the knowledge of how the drug actually works.  There is no doubt that more effective drugs could be available if we better understood the underlying mechanisms behind disease.
As a testament for the work done in mice regarding the role of IL-1beta in T2D pathogenesis, recent clinical trials are underway testing a molecule that blocks IL-1beta signaling, anakinra.  A 2007 NEJM paper discussing the results of one study using anakinra showed that it improved glucose levels and reduced system inflammation in patients receiving the drug 10.  But again and importantly, this is clinical trials and the need to discover new drug targets and development of novel treatments for T2D is needed to help combat a disease that plagues millions of our parents, friends and increasingly-our children.  Dr. Jenny Ting’s UNC research group recently published in Nature Immunology compelling data indicating how saturated fats activates a newly identified pathway involved in the development of T2D.  With this latest discovery, it is likely that their data will bolster many promising new therapeutic targets to utilize in our fight against T2D.           

What the &*%$#! Does the Title Mean?!

Diagram illustrating NALP3 inflammasome complex. Although a number of stimuli was known to induce inflammation via NALP3 activation (abestos, cholesterol, silica, etc), prior to the research discussed here, fatty acids high in diabetes patients was not known to contribute to inflammation through the same mechanism! Image from www.invivogen.com
1)    NLRP3 a type of NLR called-brace yourself-nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 or as it’s more commonly, for obvious reasons, as NLRP3.  Although the official name of this protein is a mouthful, it’s highly descriptive of what the protein looks like.  Each part of it, each domain is important for its function.  Pyrin domains are particularly important for interactions with other intracellular proteins. 
2)    ASC is a small intracellular protein that happens to also consist of pyrin domains allowing it to bind to NLRP3 very nicely.  See, NLRP3 isn’t very useful on its own; it needs ASC to carry out a function.  The value of ASC lies with what it brings to NLRP3: an enzyme.  Specifically, an enzyme called caspase-1 associates with ASC, so when NLRP3 recruits ASC, it’s recruiting caspase-1 too.  Caspase-1 is a very important enzyme for the immune response because it chops up big cytokines into a smaller, more functional fragment that can be secreted by the cell.  What kind of cytokines does caspase-1 process?  None other than the much-talked-about pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-1beta.
3)    Inflammasome is a term to describe a group of proteins interacting with each other that promote inflammation.  The NLRP3-ASC inflammasome therefore refers to the complex containing NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1.  It is known that a wide variety of PAMPs and danger-associated signals activate the formation of this signaling complex.  Recently, a lot of work has been done investigating the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in a variety of infections and injuries.  Collectively, it’s now known that the NLRP3 inflammsome is activated in response to stressful conditions (stressful to a cell, that is), like when neighboring cells are dying or during infection.  It is important to recall, that in obesity these events are not happening in the adipose tissue, so what the stressful stimuli are is the point of this research paper.
     4)   Insulin signaling refers to what happens when insulin binds its specific receptor.        Upon binding to insulin, the insulin receptor recruits another protein called the insulin receptor substrate, which will instruct the cell to survive and divide, to efficiently remove glucose from the blood.  The concept with T2D progression is that too much glucose is around such that insulin is being produced by the pancreas all the time in high amounts-which desensitizes adipocytes, so that blood-glucose levels remain high.  One likely candidate that causes this effect is impaired insulin receptor signaling.

Put all these terms together and we can now infer that: Certain fats we eat cause the NLRP3 inflammasome to assemble.  The NLRP3 inflammasome contains caspase-1, which will process IL-1beta for release into tissue, which not only promotes inflammation but also blocks insulin receptor signaling, therefore instigating the onset of T2D.
Ready for an adventure? Read on for a guided-tour through the scientific data!
Palmitate is an example of a saturated fatty acid, common at high levels in obese and T2D patients. Image from www.yellowtang.org
Ok, so we’re not quite ready to dive into the data.  We first need to be on the same page about fat.  Fat is essential to our well-being.  Fat provides most of our energy allowing our bodies to do all the amazing things it needs to do to live.  But if there’s one central theme about preventing T2D it’s “excess Let’s all agree that saturated fats are generally pretty bad for us, especially in excess.  Saturated fats derive mainly from meats and dairy.  Because of their compact structure, if they build up in your arteries a clog can form and increase LDL cholesterol levels.  Unsaturated fats are more flexible and come from plants and lower the “bad” LDL cholesterol.  The kind of fat used throughout the experiments discussed below is palmitate, which is an abundant saturated fatty acid in the blood of people who consume a high fat diet 11, the main culprit of obesity and T2D development.  And on that note, let’s dive into the data!
The first thing Wen and colleagues logically wanted to determine was whether palmitate could in fact activate the inflammasome, as their title suggests.  To do  this, they activated macrophages in culture with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is required to make what is called “pro-IL-1beta”-the protein that caspase-1 cleaves into mature IL-1b for secretion.  If you want to measure IL-1beta released by macrophages stimulated with only LPS, you will hardly find a trace of it.  Wen, et al. show that LPS-primed macrophages will secrete loads of IL-1beta when there palmitate around in a time and dose-dependent manner.  Furthermore, palmitate only signals IL-1beta release from macrophages that express NLRP3 and ASC as macrophages deficient in either of these proteins significantly reduce the amount of IL-1beta produced. These cytokine effects appear to be NLRP3 inflammasome-specific since when they look at another cytokine (TNFalpha or IL-6), which don’t need caspase-1, palmitate does not affect their secretion.   Finally, the authors illustrate, biochemically, that palmitate activates caspase-1 allowing the cleavage of pro-IL-1beta into mature IL-1beta. The data is clear: high levels of the saturated fat, palmitate, promotes the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta via NLRP3-inflammasome dependent mechanism.  Amazingly, these effects don’t occur when LPS-primed macrophages are stimulated by unsaturated fatty acids. But how is this happening? Is the saturated fatty acid activating the inflammasome directly or indirectly?
As mentioned, when cells are stressed out they signal the NLRP3 inflammasome to assemble and start to secrete inflammatory cytokines to warn the rest of the immune system that something isn’t right and that help is needed.  It is well established when cells are stressed, their mitochondria (the energy machine of the cell) loses membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS) start to seep into the cytosol.  Furthermore, it’s also known that ROS controls NLRP3 association with ASC and is therefore crucial in inflammasome assembly.  
So it makes perfect sense for the authors to investigate whether palmitate can activate ROS.  Using a special dye that turns fluorescent in the presence of ROS, Wen, et al. show that palmitate increases ROS generation in cells and that this effect is blocked in the presence of a ROS-inhibitor.  Moreover in the presence of palmitate, they showed that IL-1beta is produced, but now-in the presence of this ROS-inhibitor, caspase-1 activity and IL-1beta production greatly diminishes.  All together, these data signify a novel finding-and the basis of how this story ended up in Nature Immunology: palmitate, a fatty acid associated with obesity, causes high levels of IL-1beta production from macrophages by stressing cells to produce ROS and activate the inflammasome.  But we have only reached the tip of this iceberg, and many more questions must still be answered to complete this story.  One of which is: how do saturated fats stress out cells?
The authors explain that “the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) has emerged as an essential mediator of fatty acid metabolism and it suppresses ROS production” and its activity promotes the development of anti-inflammatory macrophages.  The researchers then set out to test their hypothesis that “AMPK plays a role during inflammasome activation by palmitate”.  Again, using that ROS-sensitive fluorescent dye, they provide data indicating that activation of AMPK inhibits palmitate-induced ROS production and IL-1beta release.  Interestingly, palmitate appears to deactivate AMPK, so that ROS can accumulate in the cell and promote NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and activity.    
These data suggest that AMPK activation plays a large role in directing inflammasome activation and that AMPK activity can be exploited by external stimuli like palmitate to promote inflammation.  Importantly, this exploitation of AMPK appears to be specific to palmitate and not PAMPs or danger signals associated with injury and infection.  This is an important distinction because they way these danger signals induce ROS production is by creating pores in the membrane and opening ion channels.  But none of these stresses were induced by palmitate, which begged the question: we now have data that palmitate inhibits an enzyme that blocks ROS, which in effect allows ROS to accumulate in the cell, but how in the world was ROS being generated in the first place by palmitate?
The answer appears to lie in process called autophagy, which cells utilize to get rid of old organelles and metabolites for energy. It’s a highly evolutionarily conserved process that is vital in cell survival. More recently, it’s been shown that AMPK positively regulates autophagy during fatty acid metabolism.  In the process of metabolizing fatty acids (aka autophagy) a little bit of ROS is generated.  Wen, et al. continue to show a number experiments to demonstrate that palmitate deregulates autophagy by inhibiting AMPK.  So not only are macrophages highly inflammatory in the presence of unsaturated fatty acids, but their autophagasomal machinery is messed up, which just further perpetuates inflammasome activation.  In short, a single stimulus, palmitate can turn a usually anti-inflammatory macrophage (expressing AMPK) to a potent pro-inflammatory macrophage.  This would be great news if the plan was to fight a bacterial infection, where inflammatory macrophages are needed to destroy the pathogen, yet in T2D, there isn’t a pathogen and these patients have chronic inflammation, which as this new data suggests is likely due to the high saturated fat diet consumed.  Things couldn’t get possibly worse, right?
Of course they can, especially with T2D since we know the disease isn’t solely an inflammatory condition, but also affects the body’s ability sense insulin.  So what does all of this palmitate data have to do with that?  Wen and colleagues proceed with a series of elegantly designed experiments to investigate the role of palmitate in insulin signaling.  First, they show that liver cells pre-treated with IL-1beta are less sensitive to insulin that unprimed cells based on insulin receptor activity.  Furthermore, they show this happens because IL-1beta blocks IRS-1 function, the protein responsible for promoting insulin sensitivity and cell survival.  Even more compelling was the data in which they illustrate that if they gave media from palmitate-activated macrophages, which would contain IL-1beta, to liver cells, the same effect was observed.    
They repeated this experiment with NLRP3 and caspase-1 deficient macrophages, which had no effect on insulin receptor activity suggesting that palmitate activates macrophages to release IL-1beta in a NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent manner, which can then go on to inhibit insulin signaling in liver cells.  If you recall, interference of insulin signaling will have detrimental effects for liver and fat cells’ ability to remove glucose from the blood, thereby promoting the development of T2D.
To study this more closely, in regards to T2D, the authors fed mice a high fat diet for 12 weeks and show that compared to mice fed on a low-fat diet, had higher blood-glucose levels.  Moreover, mice deficient in IL-1beta, ASC or NLRP3 had glucose levels similar to that of a wild-type mouse on a lean diet!  Finally, their in vivo data corroborated their in vitro findings that inflammasome activation within macrophages blocks insulin receptor signaling.  Collectively, Dr. Jenny Ting’s research group provided valuable insight how saturated fats control not only our weight, but also our immune system.   
Not only did they provide correlative evidence about palmitate, but the also went the extra mile in terms of experimental proof to identify the mechanism by which palmitate contributes to T2D disease.  This is why this particular research is regarded highly by the scientific community and published in high-profile journals.  Not only did Wen, et al. convincingly show how palmitate increased IL-1beta production, but the also revealed a promising new set of targets for T2D and chronic inflammatory diseases: autophagy.  This is very exciting research that is bound to play a significant role in supporting the development of future treatment options for the millions of people suffering from such ailments!  However, as their last figure nicely demonstrates, remember that the best prevention to T2D-even if you’re genetically susceptible- it to maintain a low-fat diet and try to fit in a bit of exercise each day.
Wen, et al. contributed significant understanding to the inflammatory mechanism behind T2D showing that the fatty acid, palmitate activates the NALP3 inflammasome, enhancing inflammation in adipose tissue and inducing insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction.
Image from discoverymedicine.com
Oh, and one last thing to keep in mind: mice are quite active during the day, roaming around and playing with each other, so it’s likely that the effects shown in this research paper regarding mice kept on a high-fat diet could be greatly exacerbated if the mice were sedentary! On that note, I think I’ll go for a run after work today, maybe you’ll be inspired to do something active too! 

ResearchBlogging.org Wen H, Gris D, Lei Y, Jha S, Zhang L, Huang MT, Brickey WJ, & Ting JP (2011). Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nature immunology, 12 (5), 408-15 PMID: 21478880








References and Further Reading: 
1: Center for Disease Control and Prevention. “U.S. Obesity Trends: Trends by State 1985-2009” 
2: WHO. “WHO Fact Files: Ten facts on obesity”. (2010).
3: Yeh, RW., et al. “Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction”. NEJM. 362:2155-2165. (2010). 
4: Brown, JR and O’Conner, GT. “Coronary heart disease and prevention in the United States”. NEJM. 362:2150-2153. (2010).
5:The President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. “History of the President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports (1956-2006)”.
6: Let’s Move: America’s move to raise a healthier generation of kids. “White House task force on childhood obesity report to the president”. (2010). 
7: Hotamisligil, GS, et al. “Increased adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human obesity and insulin resistance”. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 95:2409-2415. (1995).
8: Vandanmagsar, B., et al. “The NLRP3 inflammasome instigates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance”. Nature Medicine. 17(2): 179-188. (2011).
9: Oh, DY, et al. “GPR120 is an omega-3 fatty acid receptor mediating potent anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing effects”. Cell. 142(5):687-698. (2010).
10:Larsen, CM, et al. “Interleukin-1-receptor antagonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus”. NEJM. 356: 1517-1526. (2007).
11: Boden, G., et al. “Interaction between free fatty acids and glucose metabolism”. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 5: 545-549. (2002).